Articol citit de 5926 ori
Situatia Crimeei
de pe Wiki
''The transfer took place in three steps: the Supreme Soviet of the Russian SFSR proposed the transfer, the Supreme Soviet then approved, and the Supreme Soviet of the Ukrainian SSR accepted the transfer on 17 June 1954.
However, the Russian SSR never approved the transfer as required by Soviet law.
The Supreme Council of Russia ruled in 1992 that the Crimean region had be transferred to Ukraine illegally.
There are claims that the move was illegal as there was a requirement for a referendum which was never carried out and that the Supreme Soviet was inquorate.''
''Crimea: Was It Seized by Russia, or Did Russia Block Its Seizure by the U.S.?
By: Eric Zuesse
Both before and after Crimea left Ukraine and joined Russia in a public referendum on 16 March 2014, the Gallup Organization polled Crimeans on behalf of the U.S. Government, and found them to be extremely pro-Russian and anti-American, and also anti-Ukrainian.''
''Evidence About the Connection Between the Ukrainian Coup and Crimea's Breakaway
Eric Zuesse, 16 Feb. 2015
Little attention is generally paid to the connection between the February 2014 coup in Ukraine, and Crimea’s breakaway from Ukraine. The testimony that will here be cited helps fill this in. An attorney in the federal prosecutor’s office at the time of the coup refers to the longtime national socialist, Andriy Paribiy, as having been the key person behind the coup.
In the new regime, Paribiy became appointed to become the chief of national security, and the top person overseeing the war against “ATO" 'Anti Terrorist Operation' to exterminate the residents in the formerly Ukrainian area, Donbass, the area which had voted 90% for the overthrown President Viktor Yanukovych, and which consequently rejected this new regime, which Washington violently imposed to replace him. ''
http://fortruss.blogspot.se/2015/02/korsun-massacre-anniversary-what-really.html
http://fortruss.blogspot.se/2015/02/a-letter-from-crimean-to-ukrainian.html
http://fortruss.blogspot.se/2015/02/crimean-residents-protest-against.html
"Asigurari de la Moscova: Situatia Crimeea nu se va repeta"
Hahaha, ipocirizie rusnaca....
S-a repetat deja cu Ucraina
Asa au zis si in acordul de respectare a fromtierelor din 94, cine ii mai crede...
Cu siguranta, (re)anexarea tarilor baltice
ar reprezenta o situatie complet diferita de anexarea Crimeei, asa ca situatia din Crimeea nu se va repeta!
pai daca muskalii au halit Crimeea, este normal ca chestia...
..nu se va repeta deoarece nu sunt doua Crimee. Pe de alta parte solul rus la pretinii polonezi din Apus, NU a declarat ca situatia nu se va repete vu alta halca din Ucraina ca pamant acolo este destul pentru pohta mare a muskalilor fuduli. sa zicem par egzamplu Donbas-ul, Odessa si hinterlandul sau, poate Transnistria (ca doar Moldova nu este pe lista de sol mentionata, samd.
ma mira cum exista persoane care se pot increde in vorbilii si promisiunilii muskale. categoria asta de increzatori bipezi ori nu sunt la minte breji, or sunt de muskali platiti.
asigurarile astea imi amintesc de ce declara hitler....
...de fiecare data dupa ce ocupa ceva: in 1935 cand a ocupat zona demilitarizata a Rinului, in 1938 cand a ocupat Austria si Tara Sudetilor si in 1939 cand a ocupat ce mai ramasese din ciopartita Cehoslovacie: asta este ultima mea cerere si actiune. ce a urmat se stie: pactul molotov ribentrop, inca a Poloniei impartire si ...un razboi mondial. se pare ca nimic din istorie ni i-a ivatat pe muskali!